Skip to content
← Enterprise AI

PRECEDENT

Korean Legal Intelligence

Legal research, contract review, and IRAC analysis under Korean law — 대법원·헌법재판소 precedent, statutes, and zero hallucinated citations.

Who it's forAttorneys · Legal Teams · Compliance Professionals

Two advocates in court dress before the Supreme Court of India, with Indian law reports stacked beside them

What it does

  1. Korean precedent discovery
  2. Statutory interpretation
  3. Contract redlines
  4. IRAC / CREAC drafting

Built for

  1. Litigation
  2. Transactional
  3. Compliance
  4. In-house

Value

  1. Zero invented citations
  2. 헌법재판소 awareness
  3. Self-critique mode
  4. Korean citation style

How work changes

Same desk. Different first pass.

Traditional

Every page, every identifier, by hand.

  1. Out

    Receive brief / facts

  2. Out

    법률정보센터 / 대법원 종합법률정보

  3. Out

    Read cases & statutes

  4. Out

    Track treatment & splits

  5. Out

    Draft memo / pleading

  6. Out

    Partner review

PRECEDENT

The model takes the first pass. People take the exceptions.

  1. Out

    State issue & court

  2. AI

    AI authority map + hierarchy

  3. Out

    IRAC analysis with citations

  4. Out

    Counter-arguments anticipated

  5. Out

    Risk flags & next steps

  6. Out

    Counsel verifies & files

Hours of unindexed researchDefensible, citation-checked opinions

Used for

Litigation

소장, 답변서, and 준비서면 with controlling vs persuasive authority clearly labeled.

Transactional

Contract review, redlines, and 약관규제법 risk flags.

Compliance

Regulatory interpretation, recent amendments, and Constitutional Court decisions.